TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA SUAMI TERHADAP ISTRI (Studi Putusan Nomor 133/Pid.B/2019/PN.Pal)

Abstrak

This research uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study indicate that the application of sanctions for the crime of premeditated murder in verdict number 133/Pid.B/2019/PN.pal is appropriate. The public prosecutor used the charges, namely the first primary charge of article 340 of the Criminal Code and the second charge of article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The consideration of the Panel of Judges in handing down decision Number 133/Pid.B/2019/PN.pal according to the author is in accordance with the applicable laws as expected by the author. Because based on the testimony of the sanctions and the defendant in this case studied by the author, the panel of judges based on the facts in the trial considered that the defendant could be responsible for his actions with the consideration.

Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa penerapan sanksi tindak pidana pebunuhan berencana hukum dalam putusan nomor 133/Pid.B/2019/PN.pal adalah tepat. Jaksa penuntut umum menggunakan dakwaan yaitu dakwaan pertama primer pasal 340 KUHP dan dakwaan kedua pasal 351 ayat (1) KUHAP. Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan Nomor 133/Pid.B/2019/PN.pal menurut penulis sudah sesuai dengan aturan hukum yang berlaku seperti yang diharapkan penulis. Karena berdasarkan keterangan sanksi dan terdakwa yang dalam kasus ini diteliti penulis, majelis hakim berdasarkan fakta dipersidangan menilai bahwa terdakwa dapat mempertanggung jawabkan perbuatannya dengan pertimbangan bahwa pada saat terdakwa melakukan perbuatannya terdakwa dalam keadaan sadar.