REVIEW OF THE APPLICABILITY OF ADVOCATE IMMUNITY RIGHTS IN INDONESIA COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH THE AUSTRALIAN BAR
Keywords:
Advocates;, Chess of Nations;, Compliance Theory;, Immunity Rights.Abstract
Advocates are one part of the Law Enforcement Officers who have rights and obligations that must be obeyed by each party. Advocate Immunity Rights which is a right that states advocates cannot be prosecuted civilly or criminally in carrying out their professional duties in good faith for the benefit of client defense. Problems First, How is the Influence of Legal Sociology in Supporting the Professional Duties of Advocates? Second, How is the Applicability of Advocate Immunity Rights in accordance with the Indonesian Advocates Law and the Australian Bar Studied Based on Legal Compliance Theory? The purpose of this study is to answer the various problems of this research. Normative juridical method with a comparative study approach in Australia and Indonesia. The very important influence of Legal Sociology in Supporting the Professional Duties of Advocates is because Advocates will be faced with diverse community cultures. Legal Compliance Theory of Advocate Immunity Rights in accordance with Advocate Law Number 18 of 2003 is still often ignored by other law enforcement officials. Advocates are still often criminalized in carrying out professional duties, namely defending their clients. Unlike in Austalia which prioritizes the Right to Immunity. This is a special concern for each of the Governing Body of Law Enforcement to respect each other, in order to create fair law enforcement.
References
Aulia, M.Z. (2019) ‘Hukum Pembangunan dari Mochtar Kusuma-atmadja: Mengarahkan Pembangunan atau Mengabdi pada Pembangunan?’, Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), pp. 363–392. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.2.363-392.
Bernstein, A. (2019) ‘Minding the gaps in lawyers’ rules of professional conduct’, Oklahoma Law Review, 72(1), pp. 125–148.
Bolin, R. (2012) ‘Risky mail: Concerns in confidential attorneyclient email’, University of Cincinnati Law Review, 81(2), pp. 601–655. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2013502.
Byrne, C. (2018) ‘A Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Future of Advocates’ Immunity in Australia’, Journal of Judicial Administration, 28(2), pp. 98–121.
Cahyani, F. et al. (2021) ‘Kedudukan Hak Imunitas Advokat’, Jurnal USM Law Review, 4(1), pp. 146–160. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v1i2.2253.
Calvin, J. and Pratiwi, M.G. (2018) ‘Dalam Melakukan Pekerjaan’, 2(2), pp. 691–699.
Chi, L.L., Lan, N.T. and Ngan, N.H. (2023) ‘The Presence of the Defense Lawyer in Vietnam’s Criminal Justice System: Substantive or Cosmetic?’, Hasanuddin Law Review, 9(1), pp. 20–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v9i1.4121.
Dedihasriadi, L.O. and Nurcahyo, E. (2020) ‘Pancasila Sebagai Volkgeist: Pedoman Penegak Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Integritas Diri dan Keadilan’, Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 9(1), p. 142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2020.v09.i01.p10.
Disemadi, H.S. (2022) ‘Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies’, Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2), p. 289. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280.
Efendi, Aan; Susanti, D.O. (2022) Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Quo Vadis Perlindungan Konsumen Pangan Rekayasa Genetika. Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Gayo, S. (2022) ‘Loss of Advocate Immunity Due To Obstruction Of Justice Based On Criminal Provisions’, Sasi, 28(4), p. 599. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1071.
Groves, M. and Derham, M. (2019) ‘Should Advocates ’ Immunity Continue ?’, Melbourne University Law Review, 28, pp. 80–124.
Hadiyanto, Alwan; Alam, A.S. (2023) ‘The Advocates’ Immunity Rights In Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System’, JPH: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 10(2), pp. 327–338. Available at: https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/33463.
Hutomo, P. and Soge, M.M. (2021) ‘Perspektif Teori Sistem Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Pengaturan Sistem Pemasyarakatan Militer’, Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan, 1(1), pp. 46–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2021.1.1.46-68.
Jaya Putra, M. (2019) ‘Problematics in Handling Criminal Offence on Poor Communities by Advocate (A Study on Gunung Sugih District Court)’, FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(1), p. 31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v13no1.1406.
Jervis, C.E.M. (2019) ‘Jurisdictional immunities revisited: An analysis of the procedure substance distinction in international law’, European Journal of International Law, 30(1), pp. 105–128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz009.
Khalid, A. (2019) ‘Upaya Kriminalisasi Terhadap Advokat Dalam Menjalankan Profesi Hukum’, Jentera Hukum Borneo, 03(18), pp. 136–170. Available at: http://ejournal.uay.ac.id/index.php/jhb.
Khambali, M. (2017) ‘Hak Imunitas Advokat Tidak Tak Terbatas’, Cakrawala Hukum, 19(1), pp. 1–29. Available at: https://ejournal.up45.ac.id/index.php/cakrawala-hukum/article/download/328/291.
Legowo, N.A. and Puspitosari, H. (2023) ‘Settlement of Any Cases By Advocates Against Clients’, JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research), 8(1), pp. 30–41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35457/josar.v9i1.2526.
Lie, G., Ramadhan, D.A. and Redi, A. (2023) ‘Komisi Independen Perlindungan Data Pribadi: Quasi Peradilan Dan Upaya Terciptanya Right To Be Forgotten Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Yudisial, 15(2), p. 227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i2.530.
Logan, J. (2023) ‘Judicial Accountability – New Developments and Threats” A Paper delivered at the Commonwealth Lawyers’, in New Developments and Threats”A Paper delivered at theCommonwealth Lawyers.
Matnuh, H. (2018) ‘Law as a Tool of Social Engineering’, 147(Icsse 2017), pp. 118–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/icsse-17.2018.28.
Mauluna, A.E. and Husodo, J.A. (2022) ‘Analisis Perbandingan Pengaturan Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Profesi Advokat antara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat’, 6(1), pp. 1–19.
Mcleod, B.S. (2012) ‘The Milgram Experiment’, Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, pp. 3311–3311. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_6025.
Moore, J. (2020) ‘Attorney–client communication in public defense: a qualitative examination’, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(6), pp. 908–938. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419861672 28.
Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, I. and Said, M.Y. (2021) ‘Metodologi Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum’, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14.
Orozco, D. (2020) ‘A systems theory of compliances law’, Journal of Business Law, 22(2), pp. 246–301. Available at: https://perma.cc/366X-9U2S].
Rogers, J. and Bell, F. (2019) ‘The Ethical AI Lawyer: What is Required of Lawyers When They Use Automated Systems?’, Law, Technology and Humans, 1(1), pp. 80–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.v1i0.1324.
Susanti, E. and Rahardjo, E. (2018) Hukum dan Kriminologi. Bandar Lampung: AURA CV Anugrah Utama Raharja. Available at: https://jdih.situbondokab.go.id/barang/buku/Hukum dan Kriminologi Buku Ajar (Emilia Susanti, S.H., M.H. Eko Rahadjo, S.H. etc.) (z-lib.org).pdf.
Susanto, H. et al. (2023) ‘Pertentangan Hak Imunitas Advokat dengan Obstruction of Justice dalam Putusan Nomor 9 / Pid . Sus /TPK/2018/PN.JKT.PST’, Proceeding: 5TH NATIONAL CONFERENCE on Law Studies, pp. 648–662. Available at: https://conference.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/ncols/article/view/2722.
Wolski, B. (2020) ‘Confidentiality and privilege in mediation: Concepts in need of better regulation and explanation’, University of New South Wales Law Journal, 43(4), pp. 1552–1594. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53637/lodc7766.
