DEED OF MEETING DECISION DECLARATION BASED ON INVALID EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (CASE STUDY COURT DECISION NO.141/PDT.G/2018/PN.BLB)
Keywords:
The Deed of the Statement of the Meeting (PKR), the General Meeting of Shareholders, and responsibility of public notary.Abstract
The issuing of the deed of the Statement of the Resolution of General Meeting (PKR) is resulted by the General Meeting of Shareholders (“GMOS”) which is done, in order to ensure the certainty of the law for the decision of the Resolutions of GMOS. The problem arising when the deed of PKR is based on the invalid GMOS (as stipulated on the Resolutions of Extraordinary of General Meeting of Shareholders by PT SGY dated 7 September 2017 which is held by the Board of Commissioners). Therefore, this research is focused for the legal impact by the deed of PKR which is based on the invalid Resolutions of GMOS and responsibility of the public Notary as the party who issued its. The decision of the court of this research is to determine the legal practice of the tort possibility in the Resolutions of General Meeting of Shareholders and the execution of deed PKR by the public notary as the issuer of deed of PKR. The Panel of Judges decided that the defendants have done the tort and punish them to pay the redeem to plaintiff for jointly responsibility including the Notary. Therefore, in order to answer the problem above, the researcher using the method juridical-normative. Furthermore, from this research also shows that the legal consequences of the deed of PKR which is executed by the invalid resolutions of GMOS whether the deed or Resolutions of GMOS become null and void and those responsibility could be the responsibility of the Public Notary as the issuer of deed PKR.
The Deed of the Statement of the Meeting (PKR), the General Meeting of Shareholders, and responsibility of public notary.
References
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas. UU No.40, LN No.106 Tahun 2007.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, UU No.2, LN No.3 Tahun 2014.
Buku
Adam, Muhammad. Asal-usul dan Sejarah Akta Notaris. Bandung: Sinar Bandung, 1985.
Sasangka, Hari. Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Perdata untuk Mahasiswa dan Praktisi. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2005.
Sjaifurrachman dan Habib Adjie. Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2011.
Tobing, G.H.S. Lumban. Peraturan Jabatan Notaris, Cet.2. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1983.
Artikel/Makalah/Laporan Penelitian
Miranti, Dessy. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Yang Diputus Batal Demi Hukum Di Pengadilan (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung Nomor 426/PDT/2019/PT.BDG).” Indonesian Notary Volume 3 Nomor 2 (2021). Hlm.686.
Munandir, Jonathan Adi Biran dan Thohir Luth. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat.” Cakrawala Hukum (Juni 2017). Hlm.55-63.
Munthe, Stephanie dan Arman Nefi. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Akta Risalah Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa Yang Diduga Dibuat Secara Melawan Hukum (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung No.484/PDT/2020/PT.BDG).” Indonesian Notary Volume 4 Nomor 1 (2022). Hlm.493.
Pangesti, Shinta. “Akta PKR Dari RUPS Luar Biasa Yang Mengandung Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Kajian Putusan Nomor 45/Pdt/2014/PTR).” Jurnal Yudisial Volume 13 Nomor 3 (Desember 2020). Hlm.331.
Tanaka, Yasin. “Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Keputusan Pemegang Saham Diluar Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.” Repertorium (1 Januari-Juni 2017). Hlm.113-120.
Yuliadi, Anang, Siti Hajati Hoesin dan Mohammad Fajri Mekka Putra. “Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Yang Didasarkan Pada Notulen Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa Yang Cacat Hukum (Studi Putusan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 12/PTS/MJ/PWN.PROV.DKIJAKARTA/XI/2018).” Indonesian Notary Volume I Nomor 003 (2019) Hlm.15.
Putusan Pengadilan
Pengadilan Negeri Bale Bandung. Putusan No. 141/Pdt.G/2018.PN Blb Tahun 2018.
